• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

My Football Writer

My Football Writer Norwich City news… comment… analysis

Norwich City – news, comment and analysis

Find the best betting sites
  • Home
  • About us
  • The Team
  • Archives Index
  • Patreon
  • ADVERTISE
  • Contact us

Lambert issues a second statement to knock the Burnley talk on the head; Malky for Turf Moor, anyone?

7th January 2011 By Rick Waghorn 1 Comment

Please share

One City favourite could tonight take the heat firmly off another as speculation first continued to mount and then all-but ended regarding Burnley’s interest in Canary boss Paul Lambert.

City being City – or Canary fans being Canary fans – and news that the club had officially rejected Burnley’s equally official approach for the services of Lambert last night failed to dampen fears that their manager would be off.

It proved a long day; one in which the doubts, the questions lingered.

That money would talk; that he would be off; that City’s best-laid promotion plans would be de-railed by the Lancashire side – still bank-rolled by those Premiership parachute millions.

Whatever Lambert might have said at this morning’s Press conference ahead of tomorrow’s FA Cup clash with Leyton Orient, the fear that he was about to up sticks and disappear hadn’t wholly disappeared.

Tonight and the City boss appeared to bang a final nail firmly into that particular coffin was a further statement issued on the club website.

“I can’t stop speculation linking me with other clubs,” Lambert told the official site.

“But I’ve said on numerous occasions before that I am happy here and that is still the case.

“We’ve got a job to do here,” he added. “Starting with an important cup match with Leyton Orient tomorrow – and that’s what I want everyone to be focussing on.

“I want to put the speculation to bed –I never had any intention of going elsewhere and nothing has changed. All the speculation is wide of the mark and, hopefully, now the rumour mill about the Burnley job can focus elsewhere.”

As it duly did.

For what might give Canary fans even greater hope that it was ‘Panic over!’ were the words of Clarets legend Andy Payton – who was touting the claims of ex-Canary favourite and his ex-Bhoys pal Malky Mackay for the vacancy at Turf Moor.

The suggestion that they should turn their attention to the Watford chief will be warmly welcomed by everyone in Norfolk – leave our Lambo alone would be the message from everyone from owner and board down this evening.

“Malky was a very sensible type of guy and I wasn’t surprised that he went on to become a manager,” Payton told the Lancashire Evening Telegraph this evening, after the Clarets continued their search for a replacement for the sacked Brian Laws.

Bournemouth boss Eddie Howe was another mentioned in despatches; he, it appears, has further fans in Crystal Palace.

Mackay, however, might fit the bill as the Hornets continue to do their best in some very trying financial circumstances.

Payton was willing to draw some comparisons with another Scot – and not Lambert. A man who – legend insists – was Peter Grant’s preferred choice as Canary first team coach.

“Dare I say it, but I can see the similarities with Owen Coyle,” Payton told the paper, as the Canaries vowed ‘tooth and nail’ to keep Lambert at the helm.

“Owen was unbelievably enthusiastic and I think Malky is too,” he added.

 “You want someone who can get results and Malky has done that at Watford. He has done a great job there.

“They are in the play-off places and it’s not so long ago that they were talking about relegation at Watford. I think he would be a very good candidate.”

This morning and Lambert’s response to the inevitable questions was short and to the point.

“You have seen the statement and I am happy with that,” Lambert told the Press.

“It’s all about the game tomorrow and trying to get through that. I’ll say it once and once only – ask me about the game.

“That is all I am here for. To win a game of football. Don’t push me on anything because the statement is there.”

Clearly, it was a distraction he could have done without.

Tonight and courtesy of that second statement, the hope was that the subject was done and dusted; as far as Burnley were concerned ‘There was nothing to see here… Move on… End of…


Please share

Filed Under: Latest news

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael D says

    8th January 2011 at 8:39 am

    Yesterday was completely crazy. I thought there are two big lessons that can be learned from it. The first is the obvious one – the danger of social networking frenzies when people ignore the evidence and go around lighting multiple fires when there is no smoke at all.

    Lambert, who as we all know doesn’t like to make a song and dance of things, has now had to make 3 specific statements on Burnley. His first of over a week ago, when he dismissed all the rumours around Burnley and the silly transfer stories – Michael Owen et al; then yesterday morning, when he reiterated he was happy with the Board’s own response, and then finally yesterday evening.

    Now, if there is anything that is going to upset Lambert it is this claustrophobic and cloying attention of fans, particularly when they show they don’t trust what he has said. This is not to say that he won’t eventually go when he is made an offer too good to refuse, particularly if it helps him with his family situation, which clearly is difficult – though I would much prefer it if he would decide that some Norwich school would do just as well for his kids!

    No, but what all the fuss does say for me, which is the second lesson, and this one for the Board, is that I would really like to see a succession strategy for Lambert in place before it happens. This is what happened with the great Liverpool of old, and considering how smart McNally is, that is what I would want know. One way to go might be a different kind of contract for Culverhouse, to make sure that if Lambert did go, he would remain.

    Culverhouse’s role is extremely important – after all Chelsea’s current decline stems from the week they removed Ray Wilkins, suggesting that he was the critical factor, not Ancelotti. I am not suggesting the same applies for City, we all know that Lambert has made the difference. Still, if it did become clearer what would likely happen when a really top club does come calling, the chances of City being much less affected by his departure would be that much greater. Let’s just hope that we are safely in the Premier League by that time…

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

FIND MY FOOTBALL WRITER ON

As featured on NewsNow: Norwich City news” style=

Norwich City News 24/7

@NorwichCityFC Latest

norwichcityfc Norwich City FC @norwichcityfc ·
21 Sep

Academy player Ben Watt has completed a season-long loan move to Braintree Town.

Best of luck, Ben 👊

Reply on Twitter 1704809338152292462 Retweet on Twitter 1704809338152292462 Like on Twitter 1704809338152292462 19 Twitter 1704809338152292462
norwichcityfc Norwich City FC @norwichcityfc ·
21 Sep

Happy birthday, @Danny_Batth 🎉

Reply on Twitter 1704758358425886971 Retweet on Twitter 1704758358425886971 1 Like on Twitter 1704758358425886971 83 Twitter 1704758358425886971
norwichcityfc Norwich City FC @norwichcityfc ·
20 Sep

The head coach's thoughts 💭

Reply on Twitter 1704635908501221796 Retweet on Twitter 1704635908501221796 2 Like on Twitter 1704635908501221796 41 Twitter 1704635908501221796
norwichcityfc Norwich City FC @norwichcityfc ·
20 Sep

🎙 @shaneduffy reflects on a disappointing night.

Reply on Twitter 1704634823220830676 Retweet on Twitter 1704634823220830676 1 Like on Twitter 1704634823220830676 26 Twitter 1704634823220830676
Load More...

Copyright © 2023 21VC Ltd | All rights reserved | Not to be reproduced without prior permission.

Disclaimer: The information on this website consists of personal opinions. Whilst we have taken all reasonable steps to ensure that the information contained on these Web pages is accurate and correct at the time of writing we do not accept any liability whatsover for any loss or damage caused by reliance on this information.

We do not accept any responsibility for information contained in other websites to which this site links. We strongly advise users to check any information before acting or relying on it.

Developed and Hosted by