• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

My Football Writer

My Football Writer Norwich City news… comment… analysis

Norwich City – news, comment and analysis

Find the best betting sites
  • Home
  • About us
  • The Team
  • Archives Index
  • Patreon
  • ADVERTISE
  • Contact us

Swearing, tension, frayed nerves and the odd triumph – all part of the rich tapestry of being a City supporter

5th October 2016 By Stewart Lewis 4 Comments

Please share

Someone once described my articles on this site as ‘cultured’.  Well, not today.

If you’re not comfortable with swearing and the less refined side of human nature, look away now.

Still with me, eh?   Very good.   Some of today’s thoughts were prompted by a new set of guidelines issued by the broadcasting regulator Ofcom, in particular around the use of swear words.

After careful consideration and long discussion, no doubt – which must have been interesting for the assistants bringing occasional tea and coffee into the meeting – they’ve divided swear words and phrases into four levels of offensiveness.

The first category comprises mild words such as ‘bloody’ and ‘bugger’ (interestingly, ‘ginger’ also falls into that group).  I had a momentary thought whether Craig Revel Horwood might be involved in the process when I saw ‘Balls’ in the second category; ‘bollocks’ is (are?) also there.

The third and fourth categories are stronger, of course.  Respecting the delicate sensibilities of MFW readers, I won’t spell them out; you can imagine.

Now, I’m not a habitual swearer.  Not that I disapprove – I just subscribe to the old school view that it loses its effect if you do it all the time.  But the Ofcom list made me aware that I use most of the words at some point, and that I reserve different categories for different situations.

The first two levels are probably more common in my speech than I appreciate.  Regular events such as forgetting the milk that’s been on the doorstep all day, or receiving one of those notes that a package couldn’t be delivered – yes, clearly Category 1 or 2.

Category 3 is mainly reserved for DIY, the golf course and listening to Canarycall.

As for Level 4, that’s strictly for Liverpool (h) or Newcastle (a).

Speaking of Newcastle – it was our 10th league game, the earliest point at which I said it would be legitimate to make judgements on the 2016-17 Canaries.  So where – apart from the obvious of being in the top two – do we stand?

Not for the first time, the most pertinent comments have probably come from Alex Neil.

On opening day he said we’d cause opponents a lot of problems.   The constant question from fans during the transfer window – “where will the goals come from?” – has been emphatically answered with 21 in the first 11 games.

Of course, everyone’s nerves would be less frayed if we stopped causing problems for ourselves too.   In part, that’s the flipside of our positive approach and players.  Ivo Pinto is wonderful going forward, but Wolves’ equalizer served to remind us that he’s not a perfect defender.

Having said that, a priority for the training ground will surely be to tighten up our organisation at the back.  We’ve conceded too many for comfort, and our ambitions for automatic promotion will be tough to realize unless we reduce the current rate of goals against.

Much as I admire the quality of writers on this site (present company excepted, of course), one of the best summaries came in a recent comment from a reader.  ‘ncfcpaul‘ said:  “Last year we looked like a very good Championship side.  This year we still do”.

We undoubtedly have a strong squad for this division, in some areas very strong indeed.  Anyone who can rest Jonny Howson and keep Alex Pritchard in reserve has rather impressive midfield options.  For me, the revelation of the past month has been the obviously committed and excellent Graham Dorrans.

Regular readers will know that I’m a (mostly retired) pollster.  Without drifting into the murky waters of politics this time, I always look with interest at online polls of football fans.

If you want to predict how they’ll turn out, I have a hint.  Whenever fans are asked to nominate the greatest or most calamitous things in their clubs’ history, they’ll tend to pick something current or recent.  The ‘greatest ever’ Man U team will include Ryan Giggs and Wayne Rooney rather than Bobby Charlton and Denis Law.

It didn’t surprise me, therefore, to see the defeat at Newcastle identified by City fans as worse than the home loss to Liverpool last season.

I’d contend there’s little logic to that choice.  Liverpool was at the end of January, with every point precious and home games starting to run out; losing from 3-1 up was a disaster.  Newcastle was certainly a Level 4 swearing occasion, but it was the 10th match of a 46-game season with every chance to bounce back (as indeed we did at Wolves).

On a serious note, it has to be said that there’s an exception to the ‘something current’ rule.  For one or two clubs, the present compares so unfavourably with the past that their fans can only hark back to old glories.  Very sad.

Aston Villa and Ipswich spring to mind.  Those are the two big examples, I think.

But I wouldn’t swear to it.


Please share

Filed Under: Column, Stewart Lewis

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. el dingo says

    5th October 2016 at 8:35 am

    A good fun article for the Silly Season (I mean international break).

    I’d put Canary Call firmly in the Level Four category however. It takes me exactly an hour to walk home from the ground and as my mates all live Thorpe way and I’m going back to the North of the City after the match Radio Norfolk is often my sole company. I cannot always believe what I’m hearing – and not just from the callers:-)

    I’m inclined to add Leeds to Villa and 1p5wich to the back-harkers. I am confident they will implode.

    Newcastle and Liverpool went off the Richter scale for me I’m afraid.

    Reply
  2. General Melchett says

    5th October 2016 at 10:25 am

    I’m not sure I’d agree you regarding the “nominate the greatest or most calamitous things in their clubs’ history”. People will undoubtedly pick from those players they have seen play rather than grainy old footage of a bygone era. But I bet those who watched Law and Charlton would still vote them higher. Would I pick any of the current bunch over; Gunn, Culverhouse, Bowen or Sutton?

    No chance!

    With respect to the Liverpool or Newcastle defeats they were practically indistinguishable in there levels of calamity. But I would contend that actually Newcastle was worse and harder to swallow.

    – Liverpool were a side who we were comfortably worse than, Newcastle we went into the game as near enough equals.

    – It just wrankled that little more that we were winning with 90 +4 munites played and managed to not only concede an equaliser but actually lose. Surely that is worse than against Liverpool, where we were losing, equalised and then lost over a massive 3 minute period?

    Both suck though!

    Bah!

    Reply
  3. Chris says

    5th October 2016 at 9:01 pm

    Wolves equalised? Newcastle was a level six.

    Reply
  4. colin m says

    5th October 2016 at 10:03 pm

    I have to admit that I’ve never really come to terms with last seasons loss to Liverpool, having sat/stood in pub watching with mainly Liverpool fans I spent days in Mourning and never recovered. Strangely listening to the Newcastle game unfold I just seemed to accept it,gave an ironic chuckle and moved on without as much as a category A. May be I’m still traumatized? Thing is I just know we are going to win promotion, great squad, well managed and best ran club in league.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

FIND MY FOOTBALL WRITER ON

As featured on NewsNow: Norwich City news” style=

Norwich City News 24/7

#NCFC LATEST

ryanpearce5 Ryan Pearce @ryanpearce5 ·
3 Apr

If usual tricks = being kicked in the penalty area and not getting a penalty then yeah 😂 #ncfc

Reply on Twitter 1642899144267243522 Retweet on Twitter 1642899144267243522 Like on Twitter 1642899144267243522 1 Twitter 1642899144267243522
norwichcityes Norwich City FC en español @norwichcityes ·
3 Apr

Partidazo el que nos espera este viernes 🔥🔥🔥.

Vamos con todo por esos tres puntos #NCFC 💛💚

Reply on Twitter 1642897241835798529 Retweet on Twitter 1642897241835798529 Like on Twitter 1642897241835798529 2 Twitter 1642897241835798529
fan_banter Fan Banter @fan_banter ·
3 Apr

Boreham Wood mocked over bizarre announcement parting with stadium caterers - https://fanbanter.co.uk/boreham-wood-mocked-over-bizarre-announcement-parting-with-stadium-caterers/

#watfordfc #ncfc #twitterclarets #safc #rufc #wafc #bcfc #rovers #utmp #bristolcity #ccfc #pusb #htafc #hcafc #coyh #boro #millwall #qpr #readingfc #twitterblades #scfc #sufc

Reply on Twitter 1642893716791894019 Retweet on Twitter 1642893716791894019 Like on Twitter 1642893716791894019 Twitter 1642893716791894019
norwichcityfc Norwich City FC @norwichcityfc ·
3 Apr

🤝 Connection with the club
📈 Growth of women's team
🏟 Carrow Road fixture

@NorwichCityWFC general manager Flo Allen answers your questions in the latest episode of 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙄𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 ⬇️

#NCFC

Reply on Twitter 1642889121868783616 Retweet on Twitter 1642889121868783616 2 Like on Twitter 1642889121868783616 18 Twitter 1642889121868783616
norwichcityacad Norwich City Academy @norwichcityacad ·
3 Apr

🏟️ The Under-21s make their return to Carrow Road later this month in a #PL2 clash against Southampton 👊

Secure your FREE ticket for our final game of the 2022/23 campaign ⬇️

#NCFC

Reply on Twitter 1642886378743537666 Retweet on Twitter 1642886378743537666 Like on Twitter 1642886378743537666 1 Twitter 1642886378743537666
Load More...

Copyright © 2023 21VC Ltd | All rights reserved | Not to be reproduced without prior permission.

Disclaimer: The information on this website consists of personal opinions. Whilst we have taken all reasonable steps to ensure that the information contained on these Web pages is accurate and correct at the time of writing we do not accept any liability whatsover for any loss or damage caused by reliance on this information.

We do not accept any responsibility for information contained in other websites to which this site links. We strongly advise users to check any information before acting or relying on it.

Developed and Hosted by