I’ve been reluctant to look too far ahead for obvious reasons but even the lads at Archant are dipping their toes into the water, so I may as well put in my two-penneth.
I’m talking of course of the club’s chances of making 2021-22 more than another single-season stopover in the Premier League. All caveated of course with a big IF.
Also, I should predicate all of what follows with a very valid view shared on Twitter at the weekend by Dan Brigham – co-founder of the Little Yellow Bird Project and, more recently, the club’s publications head honcho. Knows his stuff does Dan…
Hard to argue, isn’t it? Have we had more fun in the last decade than, say, Everton? Have Crystal Palace *really* enjoyed their seven (soon to be eight) consecutive seasons of Premier League toil more than we have enjoyed those same seven seasons of toing and froing?
Palace’s owners, directors and bean-counters have obviously loved every second, but the Holmesdale Fanatics have pretty much had to generate their own fervour rather than rely on their team to generate it for them.
Is that what we want?
Yet, of course, that has to be the aim and is the very reason Stuart Webber has meticulously formed a plan for Team Farke to enact over five(ish) years. If the club isn’t aiming to establish itself in the country’s top 17, then why are we doing it? And having achieved the first of their milestones – to be a top-26 club – then the next step is naturally to try, against all odds, to become the next Crystal Palace.
That has to be the aim. Has to be.
So, whether we like it or not, and however much we nip up at the thought of having to go toe-to-toe with Manchester City and co again, that’s how it has to be.
Dan’s yo-yo take is spot on, but there is no choice to be made.
But we yo-yo for a reason. Under the Webber/Farke umbrella, we’ve proven ourselves to be a bloody good Championship club. Dare I even say we’re too good for this division. A succession of opposing managers have deemed us the best side in the division by some way for a reason, and while this structure is in place and with the current key personnel in situ, it’s hard to see us slipping too far from that plinth.
The tricky bit is the obvious one.
Once upon a time, being a really good second-tier team would equip you nicely for a bash at the top tier, but that was a long time ago – back in the day when Piers Morgan was a mere (alleged) phone-hacker and before Sky had managed to get their grubby mitts on the national game.
But not anymore.
Some teams do, of course, succeed in breaking that first season duck, but their particular ducks do have to be in a perfect row, their planets have to be aligned, and their dollops of good fortune have to be plentiful, regardless of the depth of pocket of the respective owners. When those pockets are not deep and are, in fact, the shallowest of the shallow, then that challenge is even greater.
Which brings us neatly on to our chances of avoiding a repeat of 2019-20.
There was an interesting debate on Twitter earlier in the week, prompted by a thought-provoking piece from MFW’s own (I still call him that) Connor Southwell, in which he argued that City’s new-found defensive solidity will enhance their chances of doing a Sheffield United in year 1 (not year 2).
Connor: “In the last six seasons, only one team that has conceded the fewest Championship goals has failed to survive in the Premier League the following year. That was Middlesbrough back in 2016/17.”
And therein lies the core of Farke’s (and Connor’s) case when arguing this City side is, or will be, better equipped to tackle year 1 than their 2018-19 counterparts.
Worth reading in conjunction with this is Samuel Seaman’s MFW piece from yesterday in which he demonstrates, in practical terms, how City have sought to bolster that central midfield area that got so horribly overran last season, while also adding protection in wide areas when our full-backs have advanced.
As a collective, the defensive shape is better, the system is more refined and, despite losing Ben Godfrey and Jamal Lewis, there is now a more cohesive and organised unit protecting Tim Krul. I’d also argue that one of the key components of this change probably won’t be wearing a City shirt next season.
Webber has clearly put the feelers out with regard to extending Oliver Skipp’s loan for another season but given that Jose Mourinho ruminated on recalling him in the January window, then it looks a long shot. And where, given the expected size of City’s summer transfer pot, do we unearth another Skipp?
The answer is we don’t, at least not on a permanent basis, and so the best we can hope for is another quality loanee. That said, whoever he is, will be hard-pressed to have the impact on the team that Skipp has.
As well as being resigned to losing Skipp, there also has to be a realisation that even with promotion assured – if/when that happens – that one or more of our other starlets could fly the nest. Messrs Aarons, Buendia and Cantwell are all at the peak of their powers and with that comes a price tag that makes them ripe for those with the fat wallets, and therefore also ripe for being cashed in.
It is, after all, part of the model that we sell. re-invest, sell, re-invest…
The rights, wrongs and pitfalls of that approach are for another column on another day (and always gets me in far too much trouble) but for now let’s assume that is how it works and how it will work this summer.
If, for example, Max is the chosen sacrificial lamb – as my notoriously unreliable gut tells me he will be – then that defensive solidity immediately takes a hit. It would take a brave coach to hurl Bali Mumba, the heir apparent, straight into the fray and an even braver one to rely on the fitness of Sam Byram. But to lose Emi and/or Todd leaves an even bigger hole(s) to fill.
To lose Max and one of those two would create a major headache for Webber, if it hasn’t already, but it’s clearly a scenario that will have been modelled and hopefully mitigated against.
Crucially, if Emi were to depart then so too does a creative and productive force in the team that, on the face of it, looks almost impossible to replicate. His assists, his goals, his energy; all irreplaceable as the stats remind us.
In a recent piece in The Athletic, the Emi-effect was spelled out in numbers. Since his arrival, with him in the team, City have a win percentage of 49%; without him 6%. The average number of goals scored per game with Emi in the team 1.7; without him 0.7.
Do the maths.
And so while the departure of Max would be a tricky, but not impossible, one to contend with, to try and plug a five-foot-seven shaped hole in readiness for a Premier League is an altogether different matter.
All the defensive solidity in the world won’t help City at the other end of the pitch when it comes to that most precious and prized footballing quality of them all.
So, while there is plenty to be optimistic about and plenty of reasons to be cheerful, including having a defence that’s as Premier League ready as it can possibly be in the circumstances, the task that awaits Stuart Webber is every bit as tricky as it was in the summer of 2019.
He does have, however, one thing tucked up his sleeve. Something that doesn’t come with a price tag. Something that money can’t buy. And that’s a full season of Premier League experience for the majority of this squad.
That said season was filled with hurt and horror may, just may, count in the club’s favour, as not one player in that squad will want to relive even a second of what happened in Project Restart. Equally, the few good bits, like that never-to-be-forgotten evening when Man City were in town, will serve as a reminder of how good it feels when everything clicks.
Who wouldn’t want more of that?
So, jumping the gun I may be, but let’s squeeze every last drop of joy out of the spring of 2021. In terms of fun, this is just about as good as it gets.
Then once that transfer window re-opens it’ll be time to fasten our set belts. And for Stuart to turn his phone off.
***
While you’re here…
In these difficult and trying times, MFW too is struggling. Generating income streams through ad revenue is a challenge across the globe and we have taken our own hit.
As such, we become increasingly reliant on the good people whose generosity extends to supporting us through a monthly Patreon subscription. For these kind folk we are, and will forever be, eternally grateful.
We appreciate times are hard for all of us, and every penny counts, but if any more of you could see fit to help us in this way, we’d be so thankful.
We also recognise that we have not expressed our gratitude sufficiently for the kindness of our existing donors, and so there’ll be some exclusive content on its way by way of a small thank you; something we intend to make a regular feature.
So, once again, thank you. Without you, the readers, we would not even exist. Please stay safe.
If anyone is interested in taking a look at our Patreon page, it’s here.
Gary
Pro EUROPEAN UNION Pro Biden blowhard stating the obvious as per.
Yawn
Thanks mate… I’ll take that as a compliment.
Personally, I don’t see all 3 going, least of all Emi. Why would he? He knows he’s loved and valued here, why go to, say Arsenal, where he’ll play less often and from what I’ve seen of him, that is what he loves most. Playing football. And yes, I know money can turn heads but, naively perhaps, I think he’d prefer to play.
Tottenham are a big part of our future. If they want Skipp back, which they surely will given his impact, maybe we could take Harry Winks instead? Or, and this would be a potentially controversial move, do a deal involving Skipp and Aarons. Could work for all parties.
And I feel confident to talk this way as I was fully on board with HMS PTL at the start of this season and I don’t see us slipping up now.
Hi Gary. Great read as always. With reference to the grubby mitts and Sky line that you make, I’m sure PL, EFL and Scottish Prem teams don’t baulk at the sums of money given to them from Sky’s coffers. I know they are not everyone’s cup of tea, but in some sports (Netball and Rugby League) the income stream from Sky keeps those sports alive. We shouldn’t bite the hands that feed us….
I have no doubt that Webber will have planned for all eventualities of who might leave together with where we need to strengthen the starting 11 and also the squad. The value for Max, Emi and Todd is continuing to rise as they are having excellent seasons and they don’t have work permit issues. However, Emi has one downside, which is his disciplinary record because he can be wound up. So someone would have to be willing to take that on. The advantage we have is that we guarantee them a starting berth albeit probably at lower wages and bonuses.
If we cannot get Skipp for another season then we need a physical, pacy midfield enforcer. We cannot rely on McLean, Rupp and Sorensen alone. Placheta has the speed for the Premier League but he needs to improve his end product. Hernandez is a reasonable player but I think we need another wide player.
We can’t rely on Pukki, Hugill and Idah to get enough goals to keep us up. Also we will need to look for a number 10. I still have yet to see enough of Dowell to form an opinion on whether he can be a Premier League player. I don’t think Steipi or Vrancic can operate at that level.
I do agree with Connor and others that give our new found defensive strength that we have a better chance than two years ago to survive at least a season in the PL.
Trybull 1 Swansea 1
Replacing Emi will be some task, but Aarons is a key components and there are not many better, looks like we have the left side sorted but that took 3-4 attempts to get right
Simply to stand any chance, we have to keep Emi for at least one season. Whatever the cost, it will be money well spent. After a season in the PL his value will increase more than any cost to keep him for another season.
Webber needs to copy the Chancellor’s mantra “ whatever it takes”
If they let him go easily then it will indicate to us all, once again they have shown no real intent of giving it a real go.
In my 60 years of watching city, he is the biggest talent to grace Carrow Rd in a city shirt.
I wonder if Sorensen could fit into the Skipp role – he’s good on the ball and converted into a good left back. He has barely been played in his preferred position in midfield.
Very good point, Paul. In the few cameos Sorensen has played in centre-mid, he’s looked really composed and competent, so maybe they do see him as Skipp’s natural successor.
Hi Paul
I agree with you on Sorensen too – from what we’ve seen of him it’s such a pity he can’t get into the starting XI just now but he was ostensibly bought for the future and may well get his chance in the Skipp role – recent rumours on a couple of sites suggest that Skipp will not be loaned out again next season – although I’m sure they’re only guessing as many such sites do, of course.
Whatever transfers Norwich do, important is what other teams are getting promoted? Its possible that those 2 are Swansea and Barnsley, if Norwich is better than other promoted teams then you have to be better than only 1 Premier league team.
Covid has changed football transfer markets and clubs financial situation everywhere, majority of transfers are now free or loans. Its very difficult to say how much money Norwich would really get from for example Aarons? Norwich made brilliant business when selling Godfrey and Lewis. I have impossible to believe that all english clubs pockets are always full to pay whatever prices of local players. Outside England its difficult to get any transfer fees, it does not still mean that clubs must sell their best players and in football you cant just trade player somewhere without their own will. Free player market is surely huge in coming summer, but you made brexit which makes it way more complicated. Financially premier league is also dependent of foreign markets, surely local market is able to run business but it will be limited and affects to foreign investors interest too. Its kind of crazy that americans invest to premier league and same time David Beckham invests to MLS. USA is tough sports market for football (soccer) but because of immigrants its only sport in there which is rising. And yes I would guess same way as Gary that Aarons will be sold, it only tells that Norwich will be struggling financially in premier league.
Another good point 1×2. Who goes up with City is a very pertinent point, although it’s worth noting that whoever it is, they will still likely have a bigger transfer pot than us
Yes, but last time we were better than both Sheffield United and Aston Villa and they both finished way ahead of us.
But both have owners with rather deeper pockets than ours…..no way can I see (in the next few years anyway) that NCFC will ever be spending the sort of money on one player that Villa did on Watkins.
If/when we do go up, because of the much improved defence I’m pretty sure we’ll make a much better fist of it (and we got good money for 2 “failed” defenders).
O T B C
Once again we are at the crossroads. I for one would rather be Palace and watch the best football available every time I go to watch City.
Any business that sits still generally starts moving backwards. I think our business model demonstrates it can probably provide championship safety but I doubt it will ever establish us in the premiership as this is a far more expensive prospect.
If we lose any of the players you mention Gary the cost of premiership establishment merely rises in direct proportion as I don’t think there is any way you can sell a Buendia and replace him for less cost, unless our scouting system is better than we believe it to be.
If the hoped for promotion happens our owners are going to have to ensure we don’t repeat the embarrassment of last season because if this happens I can’t see Webber or Farke staying at a club with limited ambition.
To avoid a Groundhog Day I think it’s obvious that our owners need one way or another to find substantial new investment.
Good read Gary. I Wonder if anyone outside of The top five Prem teams has had any more eventful seasons than we have in the last twenty years? I would rather be us even as a yo-yo team than say Ipshite – nowt going on – or Sunderland, Forest, Portsmouth etc Very few seasons in last 20 with nothing to play for – Keep well
Its all well and good looking at possible or inevitable sales as city supporters we all know it will happen until the owners realise that self financing is a great idea but is just an impossible target to achieve in professional football when you have lubs with budgets many countries are envious of.
Not sure if SW and DF have 2 years on their current deals but any wobbles next season and both could look for pastures new earlier than expected as we all know contracts in football are not worth alot.