A new stadium on Tuesday night for your roving preseason reporter: The Hive, home to the Bees of Barnet.
After the dubious honour of preseason reporting assignments at Luton (twice – what’s anyone done to deserve that?) and Cambridge United (where the hosts showed an excess of brawn rather than brain), this was a rather pleasant one.
That’s to say, the stadium is pleasant: part of a new complex with better toilets than most league grounds – infinitely better than Luton’s – plus a fully-fledged Starbucks.
Most important of all, on a night more like November than July, our seats were safely under cover.
Before getting to business, a disclaimer. Reporting on preseason games, I try to pick out City players who might make a special impact on the season proper. With distinctly mixed success: some of my picks have gone on to star, others have faded to invisibility.
That reflects my erratic judgement, of course. But also the nature of early preseason; it’s a useful part of preparation, but it’s really not quite like the real thing. Tuesday’s game exemplified why.
Quite apart from playing a completely different 11 in each half, City were giving extra time off to most of our internationals. So there was no sign of Angus Gunn, Shane Duffy, Kenny McLean, Josh Sargent or Adam Idah.
Gabby Sara was also absent – in his case, we learn, recovering from an appendix operation.
Max Aarons is with the England Under-21s, Andrew Omobamidele coming back from injury. (Even if they were available, perhaps they’d have been left out for other reasons.)
It was also too friendly to judge how far we’ve added the mental strength and steel that seem to me top priorities after last season. Every successful team needs the resilience and leadership – and a bit of devil – which we so conspicuously lacked last year, especially after Grant Hanley’s injury.
I’m expecting Ashley Barnes, Jack Stacey and Duffy to help provide it. Even in the muted atmosphere of Tuesday’s game, the leadership qualities of the first two were apparent – especially Barnes who’s a natural organiser and encourager (and never complained, even at the rather worrying lack of service he received).
So who and what else might we watch out for? In the first half, Jon Tomkinson showed some Omobamidele-like composure at centre-back. Przemyslaw Placheta (once we figured out who he was) showed keenness to impress – as did Jon Rowe, who capped a lively performance with a sharp finish. It’s good to see him back.
Jacob Sorensen was hard to assess. He played in midfield, but not the deep-lying position we think might be his best (a role given to Marcelino Nunez in the second half).
Other than Stacey who looks as if he’ll bolster our physicality and athleticism, Abu Kamara stood out in the second half for his willing runs. Technically, Nunez stood a class above everyone else on the pitch, in either half.
On the concerning side, Bali Mumba has an infectious attitude but his defensive positioning isn’t for the faint-hearted. In fact, last season’s inability to stop crosses was in evidence again – not something we want to see when the real games start.
Christos Tzolis was almost invisible until he missed a sitter. I really want him to win us over, but there’s work for him to do.
Going forward, we were more fluent and threatening in the second half than the first, despite less familiar names in the line-up. Clearly, there’ll be a different look to our forwards – and a different role for Barnes – when Sargent and Adam Idah are involved.
One obvious part of Wagner’s tactical approach: he wants quicker transition from defence to attack, especially using the flanks. Who his starting wingers will be (Borja Sainz, for instance, wasn’t involved last night) remains to be seen.
In summary, then, City’s absentees and the nature of the game make it difficult to draw too many conclusions. The score (1-1) is pretty irrelevant. But certainly a useful workout against enthusiastic, though thankfully not brutal, opponents.
And Barnes – one of the players who happily chatted and posed for photos with the travelling fans afterwards – is undoubtedly the type of character we missed last season.
In addition to the players missing on Tuesday, Wagner hinted that our transfer business is far from complete this summer. We can only guess what positions are being prioritised, but fair to assume that Stuart Webber is working hard behind the scenes.
Let’s watch this space.
Final note: it seems players have basically kept their squad numbers from last year. With one striking exception – Liam Gibbs, who’s traded up from 46 to 8. Let’s hope he has better luck with it than Isaac Hayden did.
HI Stewart
An enjoyable read.
The question everyone and his stray cat will be asking is regarding the Webber situation. Most City fans, including myself, think it’s weird that he is still playing a major role in recruitment while there rumours abound he’s in talks with the Loiners to become their next SD.
Hammond has a contract till the last day of the transfer window, yet Leeds podcasts are saying once the EFL announce the 49ers as their new owners, then they will announce who they want as SD.
Will we soon have a new SD that has had no input to recruitment and a manager he doesn’t know ? Then there’s a situation where after a poor start he has to sack him and replace him.
Carry-on-regardless-and damn-the-consequences-Webber should have gone upon his resignation and a replacement appointed before the window opened; not sitting in the board room discussing how to move forward. Attanasio’s all on board we’re told but still there appears this a lack of interest in how they want the club run.
Thanks for the comment.
Of course it’s not an ideal situation. For me, though, two things seem clear. One is that Stuart Webber is giving his commitment to the Norwich job as long as he’s here. The other is that David Wagner would have been dismayed if Stuart, who he sees as the man to revamp the City squad as he wants it, hadn’t been at the helm this summer.
For those reasons I’m happy, on balance, with the situation as it is. Maybe happy isn’t the word, but it’s perhaps the least bad position.
Much will depend, of course, on how we look in the first dozen ‘real’ games. If there isn’t visible improvement from last season, the whole thing will be a mess.
Hi Stewart
Isn’t the club in a real mess already ??
A £60m plus blackhole, investors who are quieter than a doormouse, owners who aren’t saying a thing and leaving it to a senior employee to front up for the club.
Huddersfield were recently purchased by an American investment group – the new owner said he’d never heard of the town prior to asking his bank to find him a club in the Championship that needed investment. The shock was it took less than 3 weeks from start to finish, yet City can’t get a share issue solved in nearly 4 months.
There has to be more legal issues in buying a club than just upping your share issue in said club. Maybe there are more problems than documentation?
I gather – as stated by Zoe a few days ago – that the hold-up is administrative. Such things involving Norwich tend to be more bureaucratic because we’re a PLC.
It certainly adds to the frustration that while the deal’s in process, no-one can talk about it or the next steps. When it’s complete, I’m sure both the Club and Mark Attanasio will have a good deal more to share with us.
As people have rightly commented, the initial deal (the new share purchase) will put £10m into the club’s coffers – welcome, but not a fortune in today’s football business. There’ll be more to follow, one might imagine, but we’re not talking about a £100m game-changing injection.
The next set of accounts will give us much information about the debt etc.
Also missing was Rashica, he’s still our player, we should treat him as such to help our negotiations.
We seemed more lively in the second half with the youngsters but Kamara doesn’t seem to have any presence as a centre forward – we’ll probably send him out on loan and forget about him like we have done with Tom Dickson-Peters.
I thought Tzolis did well, especially the way he created the second chance. Great ball from Lunghi that created the chance for the goal. He did the same a few times last season in his natural position
You do get the sticky end of pre season, Luton , can’t imagine whom you upset for that to happen. These first 3-4 pre seasons are just about minutes into legs and trying out round holes and square pegs.,and hopefully getting that right. The second half of pre season should be about getting the team ethos and method right.
I am a little concerned about our opponents as none of the teams we are due to face will give us the in your face approach we can expect from Hull etc when it all kicks off..
In fairness to our editor, I did volunteer for Luton! It was for the same reason I offered to cover Barnet: I live down here in south-west Hertfordshire.
Full credit to the City fans who travelled down from Norfolk on Tuesday.